The Results of Calculating the Seismic Impact of a High-Rise Building According to Various Regulatory Documents
https://doi.org/10.22227/2949-1622.2025.3.58-68
Abstract
The results of calculating a high-rise building with a frame-braced frame made of monolithic reinforced concrete, located on a rocky base, for operational and seismic impacts according to regulatory documents from the following countries: Russia and the countries of the former USSR, the European Union, the USA, Turkey. The calculation was performed using the linear spectral method for seismic effects with acceleration at the base of 1 and 2 m/s2. The paper notes some peculiarities of the approach to the definition of seismic force. A comparison was made in terms of maximum displacements in the direction of seismic impact and forces in the elements of the bearing system of a multi-storey building: the corner, edge and middle pylons of the first floor. The results obtained indicate a similar approach to the problem of calculating a building by decomposing forms of natural oscillations of the system for seismic effects. At the same time, some regulatory documents have been identified that generate the most and least force.
About the Authors
N. N. TrekinРоссия
Nikolay N. Trekin, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 6507199486
S. S. Mikhailova
Россия
Sofia S. Mikhailova, student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Perelmuter A.V., Kabantsev O.V. On conceptual provisions of design standards for earthquake-resistant construction. Vestnik MGSU. 2020; 15(12):1673-1684. (in Russian).
2. Trekin N.N., Kodysh E.N., Shchedrin O.S. Clarification of the coefficient of responsibility K0 when calculating earthquake resistance for individual structural elements (columns) of multi-storey monolithic reinforced concrete frame buildings (in the order of discussion). Earthquake-resistant construction. Security of facilities. 2021; 4:8-18. (in Russian).
3. Nemchinov Yu.I. Earthquake resistance of buildings and structures. Kiev, Research Institute of the Ministry of Regional Construction of Ukraine, 2008; 480. (in Russian).
4. Kim Y.J. Seismic Analysis and Design of Building Structures. Woodhead Publishing, 2024; 268.
5. Datta T.K. Seismic analysis of structures. John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, 2010; 464.
6. Mkrtychev O.V. Safety of buildings and structures during seismic and emergency impacts. Moscow, MGSU, 2010; 152. (in Russian).
7. Aizenberg Ya.M., Kodysh E.N., Nikitin I.K., Smirnov V.I., Trekin N.N. Earthquake-resistant multi-storey buildings with reinforced concrete frame. Moscow, Publishing House of the Association of Construction Universities, 2012; 264. (in Russian).
8. Mkrtychev O.V., Dorozhinskiy V.B., Sidorov D.S. Seismic Resistance Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings of Different Structural Schemes. Vestnik MGSU. 2015; 12:66-75. (in Russian).
9. Kabantsev O.V., Useinov E.S., Sharipov Sh. Determination of allowable damage factor of antiseismic structures. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2016; 2(55):117-129. (in Russian).
10. Tamrazyan A.G., Matseevich T.A. Estimation of Damage Degree of Buildings in Earthquakes by Statistical Modeling Method. Reinforced concrete structures. 2024; 7(3):3-11. DOI: 10.22227/2949-1622.2024.3.3-11 (in Russian).
11. Kurbatskiy E.N., Mondrus V.L. Dynamic coefficients or response spectra of structures to earthquake? ACADEMIA. Architecture and Construction. 2019; 1:107-114. (in Russian).
12. Atabekyan R.A., Nazaretyan S.N. Some methods for determining seismic impacts on structures by different building codes and possibility of creating a unified method. Voprosy Inzhenernoi Seismologii (Problems of Engineering Seismology). 2022; 49(3):39-53. (in Russian).
13. K Hadar Elmi, Erdal Coskun. Comparative of Study the Design Spectra Defined by Various Seismic Codes. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT). 2020; 9:722-728.
14. Xie Qi. The application of seismic parameters conversion among different structure design codes. Material Science, Engineering and Applications. 2022; 2:49-55.
15. Gunawan N., Han A., Gan B.S. Proposed design philosophy for seismic-resistant buildings. Civil Engineering Dimension. 2019; 21:1-5.
16. SP 14.13330.2018. Seismic building design code. Updated version of SNiP II-7–81. (in Russian).
17. SP 267.1325800.2016. High rise buildings and complexes. Design rules. (in Russian).
18. SNiP II-7–81. Building codes and regulations. Construction in seismic areas. (in Russian).
19. SP of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2.03-30–2017. Code of Rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Construction in seismic zones. (in Russian).
20. SN of the Republic of Armenia II-6.02–2006. Earthquake-resistant construction. Design standards. (in Russian).
21. KMK 2.01.03–19. Building codes and regulations of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Construction in seismic areas. (in Russian).
22. EN 1998 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance: EN 1998-1:2004. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
23. ASCE/SEI 7–22. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.
24. TEC 2007: Turkish Earthquake Code–2007.
Review
For citations:
Trekin N.N., Mikhailova S.S. The Results of Calculating the Seismic Impact of a High-Rise Building According to Various Regulatory Documents. Reinforced concrete structures. 2025;11(3):58-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2949-1622.2025.3.58-68
JATS XML




