Value Engineering Analysis of Concrete Work Process
https://doi.org/10.22227/2949-1622.2025.4.57-71
Abstract
Among the methods for improving technological processes, the Value Engineering Analysis (VEA) is the most effective. This article presents the main results of an VEA analysis of the concrete works process. The purpose of the study is to conduct a morphological, structural, and functional analysis of the process, evaluate costs, and identify areas for improvement. At the first stage, a morphological classification of rein-forced concrete technology was created, covering various options for the technology. A preliminary analysis of existing technologies has been conducted. Based on the VEA of traditional technology, the functions, ranks, disadvantages, and priorities of operations have been identified.
It has been shown that by identifying the cause-and-effect relationships between the shortcomings of existing technology, key problems can be identified and priorities for improving operations can be clarified. A comparative analysis of various technologies for sliding and non-removable forms, shotcrete, 3D printing, and the method of low-lying concrete is conducted.
About the Authors
A. Kh. Baiburin
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Россия
Россия
Albert Kh. Baiburin, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Department of Construction Engineering and Structural Theory
76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080
RSCI AuthorID: 266980
N. V. Kocharin
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Россия
Россия
Nikolai V. Kocharin, Senior Lecturer, Department of Construction Engineering and Structural Theory
76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080
References
1. Kuzmina E.A., Kuzmin A.M. Functional cost analysis: An excursion into history. Problems of quality management. 2002; 7:14-20. (in Russian).
2. Moiseeva N.K., Karpunin M.G. Fundamentals of theory and practice of functional cost analysis. Moscow, Higher School, 1988; 192. (in Russian).
3. Misakov V.S. Functional and cost analysis in construction. Moscow, Finance and Statistics, 1986; 114. (in Russian).
4. Cooper R., Slagmulder, R. Target Costing and Value Engineering. 2017.
5. Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 48. Value Engineering (USA).
6. Altshuller G.S., Zlotin B.L., Filatov V.I. Profession is a search for new things: Functional cost analysis and the theory of inventive problem solving as a system for identifying saving reserves. Chisinau, Cartea Moldoveniasca, 1985; 196. (in Russian).
7. Bayburin A.H., Mangushev R.A., Kocharin N.V. Functional and cost analysis of construction technologies. St. Petersburg, Lan, 2024; 216. (in Russian).
8. Baiburin A.Kh., Tolkynbaev T.A., Kocharin N.V. Functional and cost analysis of driven pile technology. Expert: Theory and Practice. 2023; 3(22):46-57. (in Russian).
9. Afanasiev A.A. Intensification of work in the construction of buildings and structures from monolithic reinforced concrete. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1990; 384. (in Russian).
10. Krasny Yu.M., Krasny D.Yu. Monolithic building. Moscow, Publishing house ASV; Ekaterinburg, USTU, 2000; 550. (in Russian).
11. Molodin V.V., Gasenko I.I., Timin P.L. 3D Printing Technology with Single-Stage Polystyrene Concrete. Science and Innovative Technologies. 2020; 14:278-287. (in Russian).
12. Khafizov T.M., Bayburin A.Kh., Denisov S.E., Ovchinnikov A.D. Method of Combined Construction of Buildings and Structures by Means of Lowering Concrete. Bulletin of SUSU: Construction and Architecture. 2023; 23(1):37-47. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Baiburin A.Kh., Kocharin N.V. Value Engineering Analysis of Concrete Work Process. Reinforced concrete structures. 2025;12(4):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2949-1622.2025.4.57-71
Views:
14
JATS XML
Email this article 